Some School Boards, acting on the calculations of social-justice-diversity-inclusion, have declared that math is racist. The Ontario Ministry of Education has ruled that two "Mathematics" exist (how do they count them?). There is both "euro-centric mathematical knowledge" and "indigenous mathematical knowledge". (Guess which one is "racist"?)
One, says the School Board, is about indigenous shape categories (as for canoes and baskets), and the other is about mathematical probabilities and prediction of how long jail sentences are for non-white criminals who re-offend.
Probably not many Humanities types understand mathematical probability, but we do think it improbable that 2 + 2 suddenly equals 5. And in a dizzyingly unstable world, we want at least arithmetic to hold steady, 100% of the time (that would be 100 of 100 times, in case you only took math recently). We may not have all been great at high school math in pre-woke times, but we count on the fact that some people were. Who wants a banker or an engineer that can't do math, or a pharmacist who can't measure the quantities of medications you've been prescribed? Who wants an accountant who can't add? For them "reconciliation" is about reconciling numbers on the income and the out-go sides of the balance sheet. Let's hope someone can balance it.
It's not rocket science -- except when it is rocket science -- but ordinary measurement, calculation, and balancing of weights, measures and distances do make the world of commerce, construction and transportation go round.
Regarding Math-Humanities Intersectionalism, there's a parallel downward race to innumeracy and illiteracy illustrated by constant media misuse of the term "decimate", as in "their rights are being decimated" -- apparently meaning devastated, although the word actually means reduced by ten percent. (cf. "decimal" etc. -- get it?) One fears that soon, school Math departments will be more than decimated.
If Math teachers are to be replaced by Social Justice Warriors, what will numbers "mean" in future? As for whether public trust in the statistics which politicians, experts and "influencers" trot out -- don't count on it.
.
