Wednesday 19 October 2022

The Invasion of the History Snatchers?

The Canadian Museums Association wants government money to finance "indigenous-led reconciliation in the museum sector". ( Canadian Museums Association recommends 10 ways to decolonize heritage sector - Victoria Times Colonist )

The "museum sector" is one of the channels by which knowledge of History is delivered to the public. Indigenous groups want material artifacts now in museum collections to be returned to them, which sounds only reasonable (although which individuals actually own them isn't clear). Beyond material artifacts, however, they want "sovereignty" over material created about them, which includes accounts, photos and art produced by others. The proper owners of artistic and written works are their authors. 

Material "created about" aboriginals includes accounts of Canadians' shared past -- the story of the whole nation, by the whole nation. It's hard to record the history of Canada without writing about aboriginal people ... and everybody else. To say that only one in-group "owns" a story is censorship, a silencing of the speech of others. (Can you imagine a decree saying that only white people can write about white people??)

History as a subject should be presented in museums, archives and textbooks by professional historians, not by ideologues with a political purpose. (Personal memoir and fictional-imaginative narratives might be by anybody of course, and are protected as free speech.)

The government money for the reconciliation which the Museums Association wants more of, is taxpayers' money. Taxpayers come from every ethnic background and ancestry.

Imagine legislation saying "only Canadians of European ancestry are allowed to write about other Canadians of European ancestry" -- how would that go over? Let's make sure the equity and inclusion principle so proudly adopted in other contexts, prevails also in the matter of Canadians writing about their society and each other. Someone can feel they "own" their own culture, but they don't own somebody else's words. That's what "right to free speech" and copyright means.





Thursday 13 October 2022

Dr. Manners' Election Etiquette For Candidates and Voters

CANDIDATES:

Tell us what you would do in office; not what you think others should NOT do

Don't attack your opponents in the media; speak only about your own platform (voters like positivity)

Meet voters at doorsteps and gatherings; do not spend time digging into the historical past of other candidates' ancient emails so as to find something to shriek about (DON'T shriek, or jeer, insult and ridicule opponents, or attack voters' ancestries)

Never remove or deface opponents' flyers, posters or lawn signs

If you see someone else's lawn sign knocked onto the ground, stand it up again (wouldn't it be nice to know everyone else would do the same for you?)

If you claim any environmentalist intention in your literature, do not even HAVE a plastic lawn sign (hypocrisy is a turn-off)

Remember that personal conduct is more important than promises, in campaigning (character trumps ideology)

Avoid terminally-overused words like: privileged, marginalized, unsafe, vulnerable, and "people experiencing ..." whatever.  

Don't use (anti)social media to get your message out


VOTERS:

Look for and share what you support in a candidate's platform; don't harp on the one thing you disagree with

Personal conduct of candidates is more important than promises; vote for civility, not ideology. (Which would you prefer to see on Councils for the next four years?)

Never remove or deface posters of candidates you disagree with (remember freedom of speech??)

Don't go to (anti)social media to get information 

Ignore what you dislike; echo what you do like (don't attack; only defend. Negativity is corrosive.)




Saturday 8 October 2022

As the World Shrinks - soap opera for our times

             (This story first appeared in Mad Swirl literary magazine:                          As the World Shrinks | Mad Swirl)

When Joe told his friend Jocelyn that he was seeing Dr. Dold, she laughed. Joe was affronted.

“Is it that funny to consult a shrink, I mean… therapist?”

“No. Sorry.” Then an extended after-giggle. “Sorry.”

Joe went anyway. His life was so empty of stress he felt abnormal, and could bear it no longer.

“My life is empty,” he told Dr. Dold, “or at least, lacking in certain things which others have.”

“How was your relationship with your parents, growing up?” asked the therapist, a middle-aged specialist in childhood trauma. The more suppressed the trauma, the better he liked it.

“Fine.”

“Did they split up?”

“No.”

“What work did they do?”

“They were scientists. Still are. Quietly devoted to their research.”

Dr. Dold tapped a note into his iPad. “So you were neglected.”

“No, they shared their enthusiasm with me.”

“Any siblings?”

“No, I was an only child, they were older parents. Being caught up in their careers they had married late.”

“Ah.” He tapped another note. What did ah mean, Joe wondered?

“You felt inferior?”

“To whom?”

“Them. Scientists. You’re literary, aren’t you?”

“Well, yes. They used to read stories to me. That’s what got me into storytelling, I guess.”

“So would you say you live in a fantasy world?”

“Yes and no. What writer doesn’t?” He paused. “What person doesn’t?”

“Were you late learning to read?”

“No.”

“Dyslexic?”

“No.”

“So, this immersion in stories is an escape from social anxiety.”

“Is it? I didn’t say I had social anxiety.”

“Denial,” murmered Dr. Dold, pecking again. “And do you have suicidal feelings?”

“No.”

“Friends?”

“They don’t either, as far as I know.”

“I meant … do you have friends?” (Avoidance, he pecked.)

“Sure.”

“What are your relationships like?”

“Untroubled. That’s why my life feels empty. It contains only one kind of thing: pleasant days and good fortune. It’s like I’m missing the true soap opera of life, the drama of dysfunction, disability and ‘difference’.”

“You are indeed! Tell me more,” said the therapist, leaning forward.

“When I meet friends for a drink, although I’m a professional storyteller I can’t match their tales of hysterical breakdown, epic strife, online betrayal, trolls, rivals, enemies.”

Dr. Dold shook his head in compassion. “We’ll leave it there. Come back the same time next week.”

•••

Next week, Dr. Dold asked about Joe’s work.

“Is your workplace diversified and inclusive?”

“Sure. I work from home, with all the diversion I want and including any projects I want. I also work for a magazine in an office two days a week.”

“Is it insufficiently diversified and inclusive?”

“No. It’s fine. Except for having to attend meetings about those very things.”

“And that’s not fine?” Dr. Dold’s bushy eyebrows shot up to his bushy hair. (Hypo-intersectional, he wrote.)

“Well… it’s a bit tiresome. They call them ‘awareness sessions’. I call it re-education camp.”

“Do you fit in?”

“Hell no, I zone out. It’s when I dream up my best thriller plots.”

“Do the others in the meeting notice that you’ve zoned out?”

“No. Too busy weeping and wailing and pledging ‘allyship’ to persons experiencing… whatever.” He stopped to consider. “Although the leader did say I contribute nothing. He says I don’t ‘share’.”

“Why not?”

“Nothing to share. No trauma, anxiety, disability. I told you. That’s why I’m here. What’s wrong with me?”

•••

At the next session Dr. Dold laid out a therapy plan. “Keep a trauma-diary,” he instructed. “You need to uncover your hidden PTSD. The hidden kind is the worst. It invades your mind-body, a silent virus taking over brain cells with happiness-fantasies. These multiply, until you live in a world of irresponsible contentment.”

Joe went home and followed these instructions. The diary he started however soon blended with his usual diary, which consisted of prospective plot outlines. He now came up with a new thriller, and bounced out of bed each morning anticipating the joy of writing it. It grew of its own volition. He showed Dr. Dold his plot notes (having no other notes in his therapy-diary).

“But I don’t understand these entries,” said Dr. Dold. “Where are your feelings of marginalization and depression?”

“My feelings are that my new story is an allegory about a swarm of ships meeting another swarm of ships on the high seas, which are shown on ancient maps as the Ocean of Words. Marginalization is indicated on the margin of the map, just here… see? It’s a battle of armadas, which as I’m sure you know means ships that are armed. There’s Allyship, Membership, Readership (because you have to make readers “see themselves”), and their retinue of Relationships. There’s Stewardship, and Their Worships: the lords of media correctness who, instead of mediating the moderate middle, fall off the edge of the map into an underworld of demons. The Island of Nature in the centre of the map is a flowery land of mild weather and balanced viewscapes.” Joe became increasingly excited as he described his story.

“You are mad,” said Dr. Dold.

“’Mad’? Isn’t that a rather non-technical term?”

“And your madness is overlaid with political non-correctness. Why are you even writing this book?”

“Because writing it gives me pleasure.”

“Pleasure? What’s pleasure got to do with anything?” Dr. Dold frowned in astonishment. “I think you need medication.” He reached for a notepad and pen (real ones, which astonished Joe in turn). “Here, take this to the pharmacy. Today. It’s an emergency.”


Sunday 18 September 2022

The problem with public transport is the public

If a crush of messy, noisy, shoving, coughing, backpack-swinging-in-your-face crowds wasn't in them, buses would be fine. 

I once lived in a small town where the bus was often almost empty, or even totally empty (that was bliss, like having a private chauffeur), because most people living there used cars. They could do that because streets were quiet and spacious, and parking plentiful and free. No problem getting right to the shop or business you needed, which was great for the businesses. 

The town enjoyed these civilized circumstances because it had a low population -- and that largely senior or retired, which meant a population with a certain calm tolerant seen-it-all, just-calm-down mentality not frequently seen in growing, thrusting, densely populated urban centres.

What quality exists in a life spent in a high-rise shoe-box, coming and going via crowded elevators to catch a crowded bus to a crowded workplace? Might the "quiet quitting" phenomenon and the preference for working from home really be not about quitting, but about avoiding too much human proximity? Is it about a Hardy-esque desire to get farther from the madding crowd? Against a background of rising world population that need will only get stronger. 

Overcrowding is a predictor of violence and aggressive behaviour. Among rats in labs, scientists have documented more aggression when a certain ratio of space to individual is reduced, regardless of food supply. The resource the rats are competing for is private space. 

In human society too, privacy is becoming scarce. In London and other European capitals with fast-growing populations in the 18th and 19th centuries this was understood, and large tracks of land were put aside as park space whether by the Crown or conservation societies. Perhaps, being closer to a rural past, the city-designers of the time were used to the lingering longing for natural spaces. Today in parts of Canada, we seem to be filling open spaces in, in a futile quest to make housing affordable by making it denser. Yet, the less space available, the higher its price and the greater a developer's investment will cost. It seems that affordability will only come when population control comes, i.e. not when supply goes up (and only the wealthy can access the supply) but when demand goes down. Should that ever happen the supply of mental and physical health-giving privacy will also go up.

We need to change more than Earth's atmospheric climate; the crisis starts with the climate of urban overcrowding. An end to meat-farming, forest destruction and fossil fuel burning would help, but ultimately Earth's resources are only saved by not drawing them down through the over-consumption which over-population causes.

It's ironic that by allotting less space per person (as world population grows), we consume more nature per bio-region.

The planetary bus is full.





 



Saturday 17 September 2022

Freedom Rallies in Canada, 2021-22

When I went to my first "Freedom Rally" at the BC Legislature in Victoria I didn't go to take sides, but to observe. What I observed was a thoroughly jolly and perfectly peaceful event, and it was interesting to note the dominant demographic of the large crowd: lots of seniors. These Second World War folk and early baby-boomers had fought and marched for freedom before, and they also knew how to enjoy themselves. This Rally was a festival:

Men in kilts, dogs in dresses,

Shaven heads and long blond tresses

Sea of flags in reds and whites

Placards claiming civil rights

The un-vaxxed ask to keep their jobs,

while children chase the bubbles

Seniors grin at age-ist yobs

and forget for a day their troubles

Some dogs off-leash chase after fun,

Freedom the concept tugs at everyone


(F.J.)



Saturday 10 September 2022

Systemic Erase-ism and Hate Speech Against the Dead

 In Canadian law hate speech against the living is a crime, so why is it acceptable to express hatred for the dead, in speech and writings? 

The minute you die, your obituary can legally be riddled with hateful innuendo, if not outright condemnation. Your obitus (death, in Latin), if you're from a white colonial background, is an occasion for legal abuse and character assassination. So be "obitu-wary", if you've ever stuck your neck out for a traditional cause: yesterday's hero is today's "racist", "eugenicist" or trans-phobic. 

The name of a former hero might be erased from schools, government buildings, theatres, streets and parks, by people who feel "triggered" or "hurt" by this person's existence. If that's not an expression of hate, what is it?

Take, in Victoria BC, the names on schools built in the early 20th century, such as Frank Hobbs, Margaret Jenkins, Elizabeth Buckley and Edward Milne. Probably most people in the third decade of the 21st century don't know who these figures were, but that won't stop their names being systemically erased from schools and streets. (They were educators, councillors, and humanitarians who had emigrated from England, Scotland and Wales respectively.)

The outgoing Council of Victoria BC has de-platformed Canada's first Prime Minister: Sir John A. Macdonald has been exiled-in-effigy, his statue shipped in a box right out of town because a group of aboriginals decided to hate him.

Name-blanking is one of history's time-honoured ways of hating figures who have fallen from fickle grace, and this Systemic Erase-ism is reaching epidemic proportions in Canada. Even the very plants in our gardens and the birds in our skies are threatened with scientific re-classification, if named after "colonial" specimen collectors. (The AUDUBAN movement?)

We do have to wonder why it's slander to hate-speak about the living but not the dead, who can no longer defend themselves. It's up to the fair-minded historian without a tribal identity-agenda to do it for them. And it's up to the ordinary citizen to resist the knee-jerk Systemic Erase-ism which is meant to re-arrange the past.




Tuesday 6 September 2022

Parents keep children safe in cars for school drop-off

Schools beg cyclists:  SLOW DOWN! First week of school: School Zone speed limits in effect! Children crossing. (You're wearing a helmet, they aren't.)

Observe bike lane speed limit because "Speed Kills". Be aware, take your earphones out, look around you. 

Concerned parents are observed driving kids to school. "For a pedestrian, walking across bike lanes is hazardous", they note. Slow-driving parents prefer to keep their kids safe in cars. "A speeding bike is lethal," they point out.


 

This story is reproduced from LITERARY YARD, www.literaryyard.com, 2024/02/10 It's a common fairy-tale theme -- imprisonment in a tower ...